Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Finding may spark cancer treatments

From Channel 4



New cancer treatments could emerge from a key discovery about the way tumours escape the immune system, scientists have said.

A mechanism which normally stops the body defences over-reacting allows cancer cells to fall under the immune system radar. As a result, tumours are left alone and allowed to proliferate.

Understanding the process may lead to more effective cancer therapies, said the scientists from King's College London.

Under normal circumstances the immune system induces inflammation around a dangerous invader or injury which tells the body there is a problem.

Regulatory T cells, a type of white blood cell, have the job of deciding if the emergency is warranted. If it is not, they cause other cells called macrophages to dampen down the inflammatory response.

The King's College team found that in some cancers, regulatory T cells wrongly perceive the threat to be harmless and send out a "false alarm" signal to the macrophages.

Research leader Dr Leonie Taams said: "Neutralising an inflammatory response in this scenario can cause the tumour to fall under the radar of the body's immune system and 'trick' it into believing that there is no problem.

"We hope to be able to use this new knowledge about the relationship between regulatory T cells and macrophages to find more effective treatments for tumours.

"Interestingly, we also hope to use the same knowledge to achieve the opposite result and block chronic inflammation such as that which occurs in rheumatoid arthritis."

The research is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

New hope for women made infertile by cancer treatment

From the Hindustan Times


The first human embryo to be created after an ovarian tissue transplant may signal hope for hundreds of thousands of women made infertile by cancer treatment.

Researchers have been attempting to transplant ovarian tissue in humans for many years but this is the first time that they have obtained good quality eggs from a transplant and a viable embryo.

Kutluk Oktay, at Cornell University in New York, and colleagues took a strip of ovarian tissue from a 30-year-old woman with breast cancer before chemotherapy made her infertile. They froze the tissue and six years later transplanted it beneath the skin of her abdomen.

After three months, the tissue started functioning normally and produced eggs. Those that were viable were fertilised in the test tube, resulting in one promising embryo.

"This research represents a potentially significant reproductive advancement in two respects: first, women can preserve their fertility by freezing their ovarian tissue, and second, pregnancy may be possible even after the tissue remains frozen for a long time," said Oktay.

Oktay told 'New Scientist' that the method might also help children with cancer, offering hope to girls who are too young to have In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) before undergoing cancer treatment.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine welcomed the research as an important advance. Johan Smitz, research director of follicle biology at the University Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium agrees. He said, "This is a step forward. For a lot of cancer patients this is good news."

Oktay and colleagues have transplanted human ovarian tissue before, but the primordial follicles that contain the undeveloped egg had been at a very early stage. This means that the eggs harvested had not been sufficiently developed for IVF.

However, improvements to the way in which the eggs are harvested enabled the team to obtain 20 eggs in their latest attempt, eight of which were suitable for IVF.

Smitz, however, cautions that transplanting ovarian tissue could also pose risks. "We have to be very careful that by replacing this tissue back into the body of cured cancer patients, we also don't reintroduce cancer cells," said Smitz.

Scientists monitor fire fallout for asbestos

From The Telegraph.co.uk

Health officials were last night monitoring the fallout from the giant plume of smoke after police confirmed that materials containing asbestos were found at the scene.

Residents living near to the site were told to keep their windows closed and people with respiratory conditions were advised to stay indoors.



Firefighters tackle the last of the blaze in east London

Asbestos causes a number of diseases and, in particular, is linked to the development of mesothelioma and lung cancer.

The Health Protection Agency said it had dispatched chemical experts to the scene and weathermen were assessing if the smoke would fall to ground level in other parts of London.

A spokesman for the London Air Quality Network said: "It depends a lot on weather conditions whether the smoke comes down to ground level.

"We are going to keep a close eye on it for the near future.

"In some case like Buncefield we didn't see a lot of pollution because it stayed up high in the atmosphere. With this one we're not sure, it's quite hard to predict."

WIDOW FIGHTS ON FOR HUSBAND'S PAYOUT

From DERBYTELEGRAPH.CO.UK

A Widow who lost her husband to an asbestos-related disease has been thrown a lifeline in her fight for compensation.

In February, Angela Cox was awarded a six-figure sum by the courts against one of her late husband Derek's previous employers.

Rolls-Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd was ordered to pay the money within a month.

But Mrs Cox is still waiting for the cash because the company, previously called International Combustion Ltd, is appealing against the ruling.

The insurance company which covered her lawyers' costs for the original hearing was not prepared to cover the appeal, which is due next month at the High Court

But now she has found a new insurance company to take up her case.

She said: "So many times over the past five years I have been close to giving up. But Derek's last words to our daughter Deborah before he died were to make sure we fought this all the way."

Mr Cox was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in August 2001 and was nursed at home by his wife until he died, aged 63, in February 2002.

Along with daughter Deborah, 37, he left three other children, Melanie, 39, Michael, 33 and Maria , 29.

A trained welder, Mr Cox worked for several companies at coal-fired power stations where he was exposed to asbestos. After his death, Mrs Cox tried to seek compensation but discovered many of these companies had gone out of business or could not be traced.

However, the 61-year-old, of Springfield Road, Swadlincote, was able to successfully sue Rolls-Royce even though the company argued that Mr Cox had not worked for them long enough for any asbestos exposure to have caused his illness.

Mrs Cox's solicitor, Isobel Lovett, of Sheffield-based Ashton Morton Slack, said it was a real shame the original insurers had decided to withdraw.

She said: "However, we are now very fortunate that we have found a new company, Lamp Services Ltd who are prepared to take this on. It would have been a gross travesty of justice had she been denied that opportunity simply because an insurer was unwilling to back her case further."

Mrs Cox expressed her relief that Lamp Services, based in West Sussex, had stepped in to help.

Rolls-Royce said that it would be inappropriate to comment while the case was on-going.

Food habits to reduce Cancer

from newindpress

The most important cause for the development of carcinoma oesophagus is consumption of alcohol and smoking for long time. This will irritate the oesophageal mucosa and initiate the development of food pipe cancer. Other important nutritional causes are deficient Vitamin A, C, E, Selenium, Carotinoids and fibres also leads to the development of food pipe cancer.

Consumption of hot beverages for long time also promotes the development of cancer of food pipe. Individuals with iron deficiency anaemia are also at risk of developing cancer.

Individual with occupation in printing, exposure to metal dust and asbestos are also at risk of food pipe cancer. Obesity and persistent gastro oesophageal reflux are also at high risk of food pipe cancer.

Individual with cancer of the food pipe will have sticking of food in the food pipe followed by difficulty in taking solid foods then liquids gradually.

Cancer of stomach is again one of the common cancers of south India. The important cause will be high salt consumption, low Vitamin A, C, D, E, Smoked food, lack of refrigeration, poor quality of drinking water, excessive cigarette smoking, rubber workers, coal workers and also Epstein Barr virus infection. Prior gastric surgery, pernicious anaemia and family history of stomach cancer also will have impact on the development of cancer of stomach.

Adenomatous polyps of the stomach are also important cause for gastric cancer.

Persistent cigarette smoking is also precursor for liver cancer. Exposure to thoro trast and aflatoxins from mushrooms are also at risk of developing cancer of the liver. There are lot of metabolic diseases like Haemochromatosis are also at risk of developing cirrhosis liver and liver cancer. The common presentations are abdominal pain, loss of appetite and indigestion. Sometime with jaundice, Vomiting and ascites. The usual screening tract is ultrasound abdomen and CT scan is more useful for the confirmation of the cancer, any patient with cirrhosis should have regular follow up with ultrasound abdominal also with serum Alfa fetoprotein.

The gall bladder and bile duct will get affected by cancer in case of presence of large stones for longer duration, presence of polyp of more than 10 mm, multiple polyps with stones and also persistence chronic infection like typhoid.

Presence of cancer in the bile duct manifest as jaundice, itching and lay coloured stools. The investigations are ultrasound scan and Magnetic Renosance Cholangio Pancreatography (MRCP).

Louisiana Court Rules on "Loss of Enjoyment" in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

From PR-GB

"Loss of enjoyment of life" is one of the damages for which plaintiffs can recover compensation from a defendant in personal injury cases. Generally, courts hold that loss of enjoyment of life is part of general damages, since it's difficult to put a monetary value on such an intangible asset. However, in 2006 the Louisiana Supreme Court made a ruling in a mesothelioma lawsuit that may make a difference to that. In the case McGee vs. A C and S, Inc, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that "loss of enjoyment of life is recoverable as a separate element of general damages that may be included as a separate item on a jury verdict form".

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that has only one known cause - exposure to asbestos. The history of asbestos in the United States is a tragic and sordid one that highlights the greed of the corporate world and its disregard for the health and safety of its customers and employees. In one mesothelioma lawsuit after another, juries and judges heard how the defendants - which included some of the wealthiest and most successful companies in the country - conspired to cover up the dangers of asbestos and hide it even from the workers who were in contact with the deadly substance on a daily basis.

In more than one case, companies hired consultants or researchers to study the prevalence of lung diseases and cancer in employees, then ignored the conclusions and recommendations made by their own experts. Many companies employed their own company doctors to do physicals and examinations, and at least one instructed those doctors to conceal medical problems related to asbestos, even from those patients who showed symptoms.

It was that blatant disregard for the public and employees that has justified the large awards made by juries in mesothelioma lawsuits. The large awards are further justified by the simple fact that treating mesothelioma takes an enormous toll, financially, physically and in ways that are not so easy to define monetarily, on the entire family of the victim.

The subject of compensation for mesothelioma victims has been a hotly debated one for years, and is at the basis of the disputes about national reforms and funds that would make "fair" payments to those who suffered losses because of their exposure to asbestos. Many of the proposals aim not to compensate the victims but to protect the villains. The per person award suggested by the latest Congressional bill for asbestos litigation reform, for instance, may not even be sufficient to cover medical expenses incurred by those with active mesothelioma.

Under the current system, compensation for losses due to asbestos exposure is decided on a case by case basis, either by a judge or jury, or by negotiations between the lawyers for the plaintiffs and defendants before trial. Many of the proposed "solutions" would eliminate the option for individuals to be awarded compensation based on their actual losses and expected expenses, relying instead on a "schedule of awards" that would pay out a flat amount to claimants based on their diagnosis.

Factors that may be considered when compensation is considered in mesothelioma lawsuits include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering and loss of consort. For a parent, they may include loss of support to the minor children and loss of moral support. Each of these items can be listed separately as a line item in a jury ballot so that juries may vote on whether it has been proven that the loss was suffered and was the fault of the defendant and at what level it should be compensated.

It is these minute distinctions that have become a large part of mesothelioma lawsuits, because every little detail has the potential for becoming a new flood of litigation for the defendants. If one plaintiff is awarded loss of enjoyment of life damages, it sets a precedent for cases further down the road.

In Louisiana, those precedents will be tested still further in the coming years. It is strongly suspected that the destruction caused by Katrina, and the resulting demolition and clean-up efforts, will expose thousands more to friable asbestos - the single known cause of mesothelioma. Will it result in an upsurge of mesothelioma cases in a decade or twenty years? Only time will tell.

In the meantime, Louisiana already has one of the highest rates of mesothelioma diagnoses in the nation, in large part because of the oil and shipping industries. The two industries were among the largest users of asbestos in daily maintenance, and exposure to asbestos was high for many of those in both industries. If you worked in the oil or shipping industry, or in a power plant, factory or mine of any type, or if you believe you were exposed to asbestos, contact a top Louisiana mesothelioma lawyer to find out what your rights are in regards to compensation for your injuries.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Mesothelioma

is a form of cancer that is almost always caused by previous exposure to asbestos.[1] In this disease, malignant cells develop in the mesothelium, a protective lining that covers most of the body's internal organs. Its most common site is the pleura (outer lining of the lungs and chest cavity), but it may also occur in the peritoneum (the lining of the abdominal cavity) or the pericardium (a sac that surrounds the heart).

Most people who develop mesothelioma have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos particles, or have been exposed to asbestos dust and fibre in other ways, such as by washing the clothes of a family member who worked with asbestos, or by home renovation using asbestos cement products. Unlike lung cancer, there is no association between mesothelioma and smoking [2].

Mesothelioma
Classification & external resources
ICD-10 C45
ICD-9 163
ICD-O: 9050-9055
OMIM 156240
DiseasesDB 8074
MedlinePlus 000115
eMedicine med/1457

Signs and symptoms

Symptoms of mesothelioma may not appear until 20 to 50 years after exposure to asbestos. Shortness of breath, cough, and pain in the chest due to an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space are often symptoms of pleural mesothelioma.

Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include weight loss and cachexia, abdominal swelling and pain due to ascites (a buildup of fluid in the abdominal cavity). Other symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma may include bowel obstruction, blood clotting abnormalities, anemia, and fever. If the cancer has spread beyond the mesothelium to other parts of the body, symptoms may include pain, trouble swallowing, or swelling of the neck or face.

These symptoms may be caused by mesothelioma or by other, less serious conditions.

Mesothelioma that affects the pleura can cause these signs and symptoms:

  • chest wall pain
  • pleural effusion, or fluid surrounding the lung
  • shortness of breath
  • fatigue or anemia
  • wheezing, hoarseness, or cough
  • blood in the sputum (fluid) coughed up

In severe cases, the person may have many tumor masses. The individual may develop a pneumothorax, or collapse of the lung. The disease may metastasize, or spread, to other parts of the body.

Tumors that affect the abdominal cavity often do not cause symptoms until they are at a late stage. Symptoms include:

  • abdominal pain
  • ascites, or an abnormal buildup of fluid in the abdomen
  • a mass in the abdomen
  • problems with bowel function
  • weight loss

In severe cases of the disease, the following signs and symptoms may be present:

  • blood clots in the veins, which may cause thrombophlebitis
  • disseminated intravascular coagulation, a disorder causing severe bleeding in many body organs
  • jaundice, or yellowing of the eyes and skin
  • low blood sugar level
  • pleural effusion
  • pulmonary emboli, or blood clots in the arteries of the lungs
  • severe ascites

A mesothelioma does not usually spread to the bone, brain, or adrenal glands. Pleural tumors are usually found only on one side of the lungs.

[edit] Diagnosis

Diagnosing mesothelioma is often difficult, because the symptoms are similar to those of a number of other conditions. Diagnosis begins with a review of the patient's medical history. A history of exposure to asbestos may increase clinical suspicion for mesothelioma. A physical examination is performed, followed by chest X-ray and often lung function tests. The X-ray may reveal pleural thickening commonly seen after asbestos exposure and increases suspicion of mesothelioma. A CT (or CAT) scan or an MRI is usually performed. If a large amount of fluid is present, abnormal cells may be detected by cytology if this fluid is aspirated with a syringe. For pleural fluid this is done by a pleural tap or chest drain, in ascites with an paracentesis or ascitic drain and in a pericardial effusion with pericardiocentesis. While absence of malignant cells on cytology does not completely exclude mesothelioma, it makes it much more unlikely, especially if an alternative diagnosis can be made (e.g. tuberculosis, heart failure).

If cytology is positive or a plaque is regarded as suspicious, a biopsy is needed to confirm a diagnosis of mesothelioma. A doctor removes a sample of tissue for examination under a microscope by a pathologist. A biopsy may be done in different ways, depending on where the abnormal area is located. If the cancer is in the chest, the doctor may perform a thoracoscopy. In this procedure, the doctor makes a small cut through the chest wall and puts a thin, lighted tube called a thoracoscope into the chest between two ribs. Thoracoscopy allows the doctor to look inside the chest and obtain tissue samples.

If the cancer is in the abdomen, the doctor may perform a laparoscopy. To obtain tissue for examination, the doctor makes a small opening in the abdomen and inserts a special instrument into the abdominal cavity. If these procedures do not yield enough tissue, more extensive diagnostic surgery may be necessary.

Typical immunohistochemistry results
Positive Negative
EMA (epithelial membrane antigen) in a membranous distribution CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen)
WT1 (Wilms' tumour 1) B72.3
Calretinin MOC-3 1
Mesothelin-1 CD15
Cytokeratin 5/6 Ber-EP4
HBME-1 (human mesothelial cell 1) TTF-1 (thyroid transcription factor-1)

[edit] Screening

There is no universally agreed protocol for screening people who have been exposed to asbestos. However some research indicates that the serum osteopontin level might be useful in screening asbestos-exposed people for mesothelioma. The level of soluble mesothelin-related protein is elevated in the serum of about 75% of patients at diagnosis and it has been suggested that it may be useful for screening.[3]

[edit] Staging

Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the doctor may need to assess the stage to help plan treatment.

Mesothelioma is described as localized if the cancer is found only on the membrane surface where it originated. It is classified as advanced if it has spread beyond the original membrane surface to other parts of the body, such as the lymph nodes, lungs, chest wall, or abdominal organs.

[edit] Pathophysiology

The mesothelium consists of a single layer of flattened to cuboidal cells forming the epithelial lining of the serous cavities of the body including the peritoneal, pericardial and pleural cavities. Deposition of asbestos fibres in the parenchyma of the lung may result in the penetration of the visceral pleura from where the fibre can then be carried to the pleural surface, thus leading to the development of malignant mesothelial plaques. The processes leading to the development of peritoneal mesothelioma remain unresolved, although it has been proposed that asbestos fibres from the lung are transported to the abdomen and associated organs via the lymphatic system. Additionally, asbestos fibres may be deposited in the gut after ingestion of sputum contaminated with asbestos fibres.

Pleural contamination with asbestos or other mineral fibres has been shown to cause cancer. Long thin asbestos fibers (blue asbestos, amphibole fibers) are more potent carcinogens than "feathery fibers" (chrysotile or white asbestos fibers).[4] However, there is now evidence that smaller particles may be more dangerous than the larger fibers.[1][2] They remain suspended in the air where they can be inhaled, and may penetrate more easily and deeper into the lungs. "We probably will find out a lot more about the health aspects of asbestos from [the World Trade Center attack], unfortunately," said Dr. Alan Fein, chief of pulmonary and critical-care medicine at North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. Dr. Fein has treated several patients for "World Trade Center syndrome" or respiratory ailments from brief exposures of only a day or two near the collapsed buildings.[3]

Mesothelioma development in rats has been demonstrated following intra-pleural inoculation of phosphorylated chrysotile fibres. It has been suggested that in humans, transport of fibres to the pleura is critical to the pathogenesis of mesothelioma. This is supported by the observed recruitment of significant numbers of macrophages and other cells of the immune system to localised lesions of accumulated asbestos fibres in the pleural and peritoneal cavities of rats. These lesions continued to attract and accumulate macrophages as the disease progressed, and cellular changes within the lesion culminated in a morphologically malignant tumour.

Experimental evidence suggests that asbestos acts as a complete carcinogen with the development of mesothelioma occurring in sequential stages of initiation and promotion. The molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant transformation of normal mesothelial cells by asbestos fibres remain unclear despite the demonstration of its oncogenic capabilities. However, complete in vitro transformation of normal human mesothelial cells to malignant phenotype following exposure to asbestos fibres has not yet been achieved. In general, asbestos fibres are thought to act through direct physical interactions with the cells of the mesothelium in conjunction with indirect effects following interaction with inflammatory cells such as macrophages.

Analysis of the interactions between asbestos fibres and DNA has shown that phagocytosed fibres are able to make contact with chromosomes, often adhering to the chromatin fibres or becoming entangled within the chromosome. This contact between the asbestos fibre and the chromosomes or structural proteins of the spindle apparatus can induce complex abnormalities. The most common abnormality is monosomy of chromosome 22. Other frequent abnormalities include structural rearrangement of 1p, 3p, 9p and 6q chromosome arms.

Common gene abnormalities in mesothelioma cell lines include deletion of the tumor suppressor genes:

Asbestos has also been shown to mediate the entry of foreign DNA into target cells. Incorporation of this foreign DNA may lead to mutations and oncogenesis by several possible mechanisms:

  • Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes
  • Activation of oncogenes
  • Activation of proto-oncogenes due to incorporation of foreign DNA containing a promoter region
  • Activation of DNA repair enzymes, which may be prone to error
  • Activation of telomerase
  • Prevention of apoptosis

Asbestos fibres have been shown to alter the function and secretory properties of macrophages, ultimately creating conditions which favour the development of mesothelioma. Following asbestos phagocytosis, macrophages generate increased amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which are normal by-products of cellular anaerobic metabolism. However, these free radicals are also known clastogenic and membrane-active agents thought to promote asbestos carcinogenicity. These oxidants can participate in the oncogenic process by directly and indirectly interacting with DNA, modifying membrane-associated cellular events, including oncogene activation and perturbation of cellular antioxidant defences.

Asbestos also may possess immunosuppressive properties. For example, chrysotile fibres have been shown to depress the in vitro proliferation of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes, suppress natural killer cell lysis and significantly reduce lymphokine-activated killer cell viability and recovery. Furthermore, genetic alterations in asbestos-activated macrophages may result in the release of potent mesothelial cell mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) which in turn, may induce the chronic stimulation and proliferation of mesothelial cells after injury by asbestos fibres.

[edit] Epidemiology

[edit] Incidence

Although reported incidence rates have increased in the past 20 years, mesothelioma is still a relatively rare cancer. The incidence is approximately one per 1,000,000. For comparison, populations with high levels of smoking can have a lung cancer incidence of over 1,000 per 1,000,000. Incidence of malignant mesothelioma currently ranges from about 7 to 40 per 1,000,000 in industrialized Western nations, depending on the amount of asbestos exposure of the populations during the past several decades.[5] It has been estimated that incidence may have peaked at 15 per 1,000,000 in the United States in 2004. Incidence is expected to continue increasing in other parts of the world. Mesothelioma occurs more often in men than in women and risk increases with age, but this disease can appear in either men or women at any age. Approximately one fifth to one third of all mesotheliomas are peritoneal.

Between 1940 and 1979, approximately 27.5 million people were occupationally exposed to asbestos in the United States [4]. Between 1973 and 1984, there has been a threefold increase in the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma in Caucasian males. From 1980 to the late 1990s, the death rate from mesothelioma in the USA increased from 2,000 per year to 3,000, with men four times more likely to acquire it than women. These rates may not be accurate, since it is possible that many cases of mesothelioma are misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma of the lung, which is difficult to differentiate from mesothelioma.

[edit] Risk factors

Working with asbestos is the major risk factor for mesothelioma. A history of asbestos exposure exists in almost all cases. However, mesothelioma has been reported in some individuals without any known exposure to asbestos. In rare cases, mesothelioma has also been associated with irradiation, intrapleural thorium dioxide (Thorotrast), and inhalation of other fibrous silicates, such as erionite.

Asbestos is the name of a group of minerals that occur naturally as masses of strong, flexible fibers that can be separated into thin threads and woven. Asbestos has been widely used in many industrial products, including cement, brake linings, roof shingles, flooring products, textiles, and insulation. If tiny asbestos particles float in the air, especially during the manufacturing process, they may be inhaled or swallowed, and can cause serious health problems. In addition to mesothelioma, exposure to asbestos increases the risk of lung cancer, asbestosis (a noncancerous, chronic lung ailment), and other cancers, such as those of the larynx and kidney.

The combination of smoking and asbestos exposure significantly increases a person's risk of developing cancer of the airways (lung cancer, bronchial carcinoma). The Kent brand of cigarettes used asbestos in its filters for the first few years of production in the 1950s and some cases of mesothelioma have resulted. Smoking modern cigarettes does not appear to increase the risk of mesothelioma.

Some studies suggest that simian virus 40 (SV40) may act as a cofactor in the development of mesothelioma.[6]

[edit] Exposure

Asbestos has been mined and used commercially since the late 1800s. Its use greatly increased during World War II. Since the early 1940s, millions of American workers have been exposed to asbestos dust. Initially, the risks associated with asbestos exposure were not publicly known. However, an increased risk of developing mesothelioma was later found among shipyard workers, people who work in asbestos mines and mills, producers of asbestos products, workers in the heating and construction industries, and other tradespeople. Today, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets limits for acceptable levels of asbestos exposure in the workplace, and created guidelines for engineering controls and respirators, protective clothing, exposure monitoring, hygiene facilities and practices, warning signs, labeling, recordkeeping, and medical exams. By contrast, the British Government's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) states formally that any threshold for mesothelioma must be at a very low level and it is widely agreed that if any such threshold does exist at all, then it cannot currently be quantified. For practical purposes, therefore, HSE does not assume that any such threshold exists. People who work with asbestos wear personal protective equipment to lower their risk of exposure.

Exposure to asbestos fibres has been recognised as an occupational health hazard since the early 1900s. Several epidemiological studies have associated exposure to asbestos with the development of lesions such as asbestos bodies in the sputum, pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickening, asbestosis, carcinoma of the lung and larynx, gastrointestinal tumours, and diffuse mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum.

The documented presence of asbestos fibres in water supplies and food products has fostered concerns about the possible impact of long-term and, as yet, unknown exposure of the general population to these fibres. Although many authorities consider brief or transient exposure to asbestos fibres as inconsequential and an unlikely risk factor, some epidemiologists claim that there is no risk threshold. Cases of mesothelioma have been found in people whose only exposure was breathing the air through ventilation systems. Other cases had very minimal (3 months or less) direct exposure.

Commercial asbestos mining at Wittenoom, Western Australia, occurred between 1945 and 1966. A cohort study of miners employed at the mine reported that while no deaths occurred within the first 10 years after crocidolite exposure, 85 deaths attributable to mesothelioma had occurred by 1985. By 1994, 539 reported deaths due to mesothelioma had been reported in Western Australia.

Family members and others living with asbestos workers have an increased risk of developing mesothelioma, and possibly other asbestos related diseases. This risk may be the result of exposure to asbestos dust brought home on the clothing and hair of asbestos workers. To reduce the chance of exposing family members to asbestos fibres, asbestos workers are usually required to shower and change their clothing before leaving the workplace.

[edit] Treatment

Treatment of MM using conventional therapies has not proved successful and patients have a median survival time of 6 - 12 months after presentation. The clinical behaviour of the malignancy is affected by several factors including the continuous mesothelial surface of the pleural cavity which favours local metastasis via exfoliated cells, invasion to underlying tissue and other organs within the pleural cavity, and the extremely long latency period between asbestos exposure and development of the disease.

[edit] Surgery

Surgery, either by itself or used in combination with pre- and post-operative adjuvant therapies has proved disappointing with a 5 year survival rate of less than 10%. A pleurectomy/decortication is the most common surgery, in which the lining of the chest is removed. Less common is an extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung, lining of the inside of the chest, the hemi-diaphragm and the pericardium are removed. It is not possible to remove the entire mesothelium without killing the patient.

[edit] Radiation

Although the tumor is highly resistant to radiotherapy, these regimens are sometimes used to relieve symptoms arising from tumor growth, such as obstruction of a major blood vessel.

Radiotherapy is commonly applied to the sites of chest drain insertion, in order to prevent growth of the tumor along the track in the chest wall.

[edit] Chemotherapy

In February 2004, the Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed (brand name Alimta) for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Pemetrexed is given in combination with cisplatin. Folic acid is also used to reduce the side-effects of pemetrexed.

[edit] Immunotherapy

Treatment regimens involving immunotherapy have yielded variable results. For example, intrapleural inoculation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in an attempt to boost the immune response, was found to be of no benefit to the patient (while it may benefit patients with bladder cancer). Mesothelioma cells proved susceptible to in vitro lysis by LAK cells following activation by interleukin-2 (IL-2), but patients undergoing this particular therapy experienced major side effects. Indeed, this trial was suspended in view of the unacceptably high levels of IL-2 toxicity and the severity of side effects such as fever and cachexia. Nonetheless, other trials involving interferon alpha have proved more encouraging with 20% of patients experiencing a greater than 50% reduction in tumor mass combined with minimal side effects.

[edit] Heated Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

A procedure known as heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was developed by Paul Sugarbaker at the Washington Cancer Institute.[7] The surgeon removes as much of the tumor as possible followed by the direct administration of a chemotherapy agent, heated to between 40 and 48°C, in the abdomen. The fluid is perfused for 60 to 120 minutes and then drained.

This technique permits the administration of high concentrations of selected drugs into the abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Heating the chemotherapy treatment increases the penetration of the drugs into tissues. Also, heating itself damages the malignant cells more than the normal cells.

[edit] Prevention & Expectations

What can be done to prevent the disease? Since the 1970s, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration have regulated the asbestos industry in the U.S. In the past, asbestos was used as a fire retardant and an insulator. Other products are now used in its place. The controversy involving exposure to different forms of asbestos continues.

There are two major types of asbestos: chrysotile and amphibole. It is thought that exposure to the amphibole form is more likely to cause mesothelioma. However, chrysotile has been used more frequently, hence many mesotheliomas are caused by chrysotile.

Removal is taking place in schools and other public buildings throughout the U.S. The hope is that these measures will greatly reduce the occurrence of this cancer.

What are the long-term effects of the disease? A mesothelioma is a highly aggressive tumor that is generally deadly. Current treatment of malignant mesothelioma is designed to make the person with cancer comfortable. Although long-term survival cannot usually be expected, the case of famed paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould is a noted example.

What are the risks to others? Mesothelioma is not contagious and cannot be passed from one person to another. The exposure to the asbestos that caused the cancer occurred many years to several decades before the disease appeared. People who live with asbestos workers have a higher risk of getting this cancer.

[edit] Notable people with mesothelioma

Mesothelioma, though rare, has had a number of notable patients. Australian anti-racism activist Bob Bellear died in 2005. British science fiction writer Michael G. Coney, responsible for nearly 100 works died in 2005. American film and television actor Paul Gleason, perhaps best known for his portrayal of Principal Richard Vernon in the 1985 film The Breakfast Club, died in 2006. Mickie Most, an English record producer, died of mesothelioma in 2003. Paul Rudolph, an American architect known for his cubist building designs, died in 1997.

Steve McQueen was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma on December 22, 1979. He was not offered surgery or chemotherapy because doctors felt the cancer was too advanced. McQueen sought alternative treatments from clinics in Mexico. He died of a heart attack on November 7, 1980, in Juárez, Mexico, following cancer surgery. He may have been exposed to asbestos while serving with the US Marines as a young adult -- asbestos was then commonly used to insulate ships' piping -- or because of its use as an insulating material in car racing suits.[8]

United States Congressman Bruce Vento died of mesothelioma in 2000. The Bruce Vento Hopebuilder is awarded yearly by his wife at the MARF symposium to persons or organizations who have done the most to support mesothelioma research and advocacy.

After a long period of untreated illness and pain, rock and roll musician and songwriter Warren Zevon was diagnosed with inoperable mesothelioma in the fall of 2002. Refusing treatments he believed might incapacitate him, Zevon focused his energies on recording his final album The Wind including the song Keep me in your heart which speaks of his failing breath. Zevon died at his home in Los Angeles, California, on September 7, 2003.

Although life expectancy with this disease is typically limited, there are notable survivors. In July 1982, Stephen Jay Gould was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. After his diagnosis, Gould wrote the "The Median Isn't the Message," [5] for Discover magazine, in which he argued that statistics such as median survival are just useful abstractions, not destiny. Gould lived for another twenty years eventually succumbing to metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung, not mesothelioma.

Author Paul Kraus was diagnosed in June 1997 with peritoneal mesothelioma. He declined surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, and later wrote about the various lifestyle changes and alternative modalities he has used to successfully manage his cancer.

[edit] Legal issues

Main article: asbestos and the law

The first lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers were in 1929. Since then, many lawsuits have been filed against asbestos manufacturers and employers, for neglecting to implement safety measures after the links between asbestos, asbestosis, and mesothelioma became known (some reports seem to place this as early as 1898). The liability resulting from the sheer number of lawsuits and people affected has reached billions of dollars. The amounts and method of allocating compensation have been the source of many court cases, and government attempts at resolution of existing and future cases.

[edit] History

The first lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers was brought in 1929. The parties settled that lawsuit, and as part of the agreement, the attorneys agreed not to pursue further cases. It was not until 1960 that an article published by Wagner et al first officially established mesothelioma as a disease arising from exposure to crocidolite asbestos.[9] The article referred to over 30 case studies of people who had suffered from mesothelioma in South Africa. Some exposures were transient and some were mine workers. In 1962 McNulty reported the first diagnosed case of malignant mesothelioma in an Australian asbestos worker.[10] The worker had worked in the mill at the asbestos mine in Wittenoom from 1948 to 1950.

In the town of Wittenoom, asbestos-containing mine waste was used to cover schoolyards and playgrounds. In 1965 an article in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine established that people who lived in the neighbourhoods of asbestos factories and mines, but did not work in them, had contracted mesothelioma.

Despite proof that the dust associated with asbestos mining and milling causes asbestos related disease, mining began at Wittenoom in 1943 and continued until 1966. In 1974 the first public warnings of the dangers of blue asbestos were published in a cover story called "Is this Killer in Your Home?" in Australia's Bulletin magazine. In 1978 the Western Australian Government decided to phase out the town of Wittenoom, following the publication of a Health Dept. booklet, "The Health Hazard at Wittenoom", containing the results of air sampling and an appraisal of worldwide medical information.

By 1979 the first writs for negligence related to Wittenoom were issued against CSR and its subsidiary ABA, and the Asbestos Diseases Society was formed to represent the Wittenoom victims.

[edit] Latest Research

1). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jan;29(1):14-9. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

Multimodality approach in management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Neragi-Miandoab S.

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA. sneragi@yahoo.com


2). Special Issue on mesothelioma: Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;19(6):

Several articles, e.g., Gene therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma, Antiangiogenic therapies for mesothelioma, An overview of chemotherapy for mesothelioma., Radiotherapy for mesothelioma, Multimodality treatments in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update, Prognostic factors for mesothelioma. etc